No mysterious strangers this week…. Last night’s class with Master Zhou was very interesting. We did a little bit of work on the form at the end of the class, but mostly we were working on fundamentals. In particular, he’s trying to teach me a series of stretching and softening exercises. These, he says, are essential for developing bagua’s power. My wrists and shoulders in particular need to loosen up a heck of a lot, and he’s given me some ways to work on that. Ouch, it’s painful!
He also expanded a bit more on what he said before about the bagua pens. I’d misunderstood his meaning on that occasion. He wasn’t saying that bagua pens had been adopted from an Emei style – he was saying that the weapons we were using in our course with Sun Laoshi are not actually bagua pens. The ones we have are 22cm long, with the ring to slip over the finger 5cm from the blunt end. The business end tapers to a blunt point, rather like the end of a pencil after it’s been used a few times. According to Master Zhou, this is actually an emei zi (I’m not sure of the meaning of zi in this context). A true bagua bi, according to him, is much longer, with the ring in the middle, and with the end flaring out before forming a point – more like the actual shape of a large Chinese brush-pen (to a western eye, one might say it looks kind of arrow-head shaped). This rings a bell, because in Frank Allen’s book Whirling Circles there’s a picture of Tina Zhou using one of these, and I had wondered to myself about the difference.
One thing bothered me a bit about this, though – everything I’d read suggested that bagua pens were designed to be concealed weapons for bodyguards, and I didn’t see how a weapon that’s basically a metal stick around 70cm long (that’s a rough estimate based on Master Zhou’s description) could be concealed in such a way that it would also be readily available for use. I could see that it might be stuck down the back of the trousers, but it seems that it might be difficult to draw them easily – apparently, though, this was one way they were carried. The other way was up the sleeves – it seemed unlikely to me, as wouldn’t the carrier then we walking around like a robot, with rigid, unbending arms? Heh. Yesterday happened to be a very rainy day, and I had with me one of those small, folding umbrellas. Master Zhou took that, extended it to about the length of the bagua pen, and put it up his sleeve – and could still bend his arm. How? Because the sleeves of his kung fu jacket are very wide. I’d been thinking of sleeves in terms of the clothes we wear today, in which the sleeves are very narrow tubes. In the Qing dynasty, the sleeves of court clothes for nobles and bodyguards alike were very, very wide and baggy – so there’s lots of room for movement around the pen. Suddenly it all made sense! Just goes to show, once again, you can’t really separate a martial art from the context and culture in which it was developed – every martial art’s moves were developed to meet the combat needs of a particular time and place.
Also, traditionally, clothes with long sleeves covering the hands meant you were rich; short sleeves leaving the arms bare meant you were a poor, working man. Heh.
Anyway, after this enlightening class, I went for solo practice, trying not to disturb the wild cats, which were dozing on the concrete around me. A couple of sets of CMC-37, several of what I will persist in calling my bagua pens even if they’re not, a couple of sets of ba mu zhang, and finally a half-hearted attempt at the bagua jian.
Anybody out there fancy chipping in with a bit more info about the emei zi?
Recent Comments